dom...@chromium.org, kenji...@chromium.org, m...@chromium.org, btr...@chromium.org, ds...@chromium.org, ay...@chromium.org
https://github.com/webmachinelearning/writing-assistance-apis/blob/main/README.md
https://webmachinelearning.github.io/writing-assistance-apis/#summarizer-api
The Summarizer API can convert long input text to more concise text, or recapitulate input text with various requested options, such as text length, format and/or type. Developers may use this API to provide a summary of news articles, reviews or blog posts.
https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/991
Pending
Summarization API
AISummarizationAPI
https://developer.chrome.com/docs/ai/summarizer-api
kSummarizer_Summarize
This feature, like all built-in AI features, has inherent interoperability risks due to the use of AI models whose behavior is not fully specified. See some general discussion in https://www.w3.org/reports/ai-web-impact/#interop.
By providing a high-level API with clear output formats, as well as a capabilities API for detecting what a given browser supports, we believe we can guide web developers toward using the API in an interoperable way that does not depend on the specific models that a given browser or browser version uses.
Gecko: Defer (https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/1067)
WebKit: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/393)
Web developers: Positive (https://github.com/WICG/proposals/issues/163)
Origin Trial signups have been 5x higher than what we see from typical Origin Trials, suggesting a lot of developer and partner interest. The survey conducted during the Origin Trial, in February 2025, shows positive quantitative feedback [1], and third-party partners have utilized the API for various use cases [2] [3].
[2] https://developer.chrome.com/blog/summarizer-terra-brightsites
[3] http://developer.chrome.com/blog/summarizer-redbus-miravia
Other signals:
This feature would definitely benefit from having polyfills, backed by any of: cloud services, lazily-loaded client-side models using WebGPU, or the web developer's own server. We anticipate seeing an ecosystem of such polyfills grow as more developers adopt this API.
Does this intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications?
None
It is possible that giving DevTools more insight into the nondeterministic states of the model, e.g. random seeds, could help with debugging. See related discussion at https://github.com/webmachinelearning/prompt-api/issues/9.
No
Not all platforms will come with a language model. In particular, the initial launch focuses on Windows, Mac, and Linux.
No
We have added some web platform test coverage for this feature (https://wpt.fyi/results/ai/summarizer?label=experimental&label=master&aligned). How much we are able to test beyond the surface API is unclear, given the nondeterministic nature of the output. The explainer discusses this in https://github.com/WICG/writing-assistance-apis/blob/main/README.md#specifications-and-tests.
summarization-api-for-gemini-nano
AISummarizationAPI
Will ship enabled for all users
True
https://issues.chromium.org/issues/351744634
https://chrome.dev/web-ai-demos/summarization-api-playground
https://ai.etiennenoel.com/summarizer-api
None
https://chromestatus.com/feature/5193953788559360?gate=5089800596750336
Intent to Prototype: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/rCpcU0ZTgTk
Intent to Experiment: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/X-VxVeiJgtM
Intent to Extend Experiment 1: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/u2MRIDCBZQg
This intent message was generated by Chrome Platform Status.
There was a request to comment when these features were moving to the I2S stage - can we do to see if Mozilla is ready to give a position?
WebKit: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/393)
Web developers: Positive (https://github.com/WICG/proposals/issues/163)
Origin Trial signups have been 5x higher than what we see from typical Origin Trials, suggesting a lot of developer and partner interest. The survey conducted during the Origin Trial, in February 2025, shows positive quantitative feedback [1], and third-party partners have utilized the API for various use cases [2] [3].
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAPhTbOjgsjNHq8YDT5P40P4upEbeXMU-L2N0CaSEWR9z3rhKFw%40mail.gmail.com.
Do you have any qualitative feedback from the OT to share, in particular around the API shape or platform availability limitations (i.e., has anyone given any feedback on the desktop-only nature of these APIs)?
WebKit: No signal (https://github.com/WebKit/standards-positions/issues/393)
Web developers: Positive (https://github.com/WICG/proposals/issues/163)
Origin Trial signups have been 5x higher than what we see from typical Origin Trials, suggesting a lot of developer and partner interest. The survey conducted during the Origin Trial, in February 2025, shows positive quantitative feedback [1], and third-party partners have utilized the API for various use cases [2] [3].
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/597a7785-ae00-4932-8aff-6b1c109ccfbe%40chromium.org.
Thanks - I don't have any further concerns, but it seems useful
to give Mozilla a few days to respond to the standards position
ping before approving.